Wikipedia and Their Shameless Disregard Of N.P.O.V. Through Their Actions
It is interesting that there was a short blurb in Wikipedia located in the area of the Age of Sexual Consent Reform Laws within Canada. It mentioned that Octaevius Altair did go to the Supreme Court in order to take the Attorney General of Canada to trial in order to strike all illegal amendments from the criminal code of Canada before any innocent victims could be charged. This article was deleted by El_C
Excerpt from talkpage
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
What do you think of this article so far?
I created this article (Octaevius Altair) and am trying to get it to NPOV, which is pretty hard on this guy I have to admit. Jmm6f488 05:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I’m not sure I see how the subject meets our notability threshold. El_C 05:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.
- 10:56, 2 August 2007 El C (talk | contribs) deleted “Octaevius Altair” (self-published propedophilia activist appears to fall well short of notability threshold (i.e. no mention in reliable sources beyond a blog); author of entry does not object)
It might not, I’m actually on the serial killer task force and usually do that but I came across this guy and was look woo. This guy is one freak. If you want to delete it that’s cool. I’ve actually been looking around the pedo articles because they said on a perverted justice sight that pedophiles were overrunning the place. I have to admit I have seen some editors that are a bit suspect. Plus, Squeakbox ( SqueakBox / Richard Weiss) joined are project so I looked through his contribs and he seems to do a lot of anti-pedo/victims rights stuff so I just kind of jumped around the sights he was editing. Anyway, I’m rambling but yeah if you want to go ahead and delete it feel free. Jmm6f488 05:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Okay. In that case, I decided to delete it, because the only sources were some blogs. Regards, El_C 03:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Apparently the fact that this matter is still before the courts is not good enough for Wikipedia. It is noted that there are many in this site with connections to radical right-wing groups and even illegal organizations like Perverted Justice – a vigilante group started my a mentally deranged man named Xavier Von Erck.(Philip John Eide)-
We are still before the courts in regards to restoring law and order to Canada. We were denied standing on behalf of public interest last year at this trial Court File CV-08-00355544-0000
Now we have had to take our complaints to the Canadian Bar Association in order to determine if there are any law firms that are not in fact representing the best interests of the client but are actually representing the best interests of the government. File 2010-2381
Those who represent the darkness of superstition will not be able to hide from our light.
We will prevail in defending the rights of all citizens aged 14 and 15 years old from the time these illegal amendments were added to the criminal code of Canada until after our victory and all illegal amendments that rely upon the Age of Sexual Consent within Canada to be age 16 are struck from the code.
We will then commence a class-action lawsuit against the Federal Conservative Party Of Canada on behalf of all these 14 and 15 year-old legally within Canada as well as any targeted sexual minorities targeted through this by the Federal Government.
It is a fact that the Federal Conservative Party of Canada have shamelessly allied itself with the Fundamentalist Christian movement within North America. Many members actually being involved with such disreputable organizations such as the Council for National Policy, Focus On The Family, Focus On The Family Canada etc. Their links will be exposed and this party will be punished as a result of their flagrant attempts to impose their perverted values on the rest of Canada by disregarding our Canadian Charted of Rights and Freedoms in order to alter our laws to divest targeted citizens of their Charter Protected rights and target additional sexual minorities within Canada for imprisonment.
Thus we see justice moving forward regardless of what the biased editors at Wikipedia feel about it.
Actions will always speak louder than words. Shame on Wikipedia. Their actions speak volumes as will mine.






Wikipedia has been the source of headaches for a number of people, because they thought they could actually maintain a neutral point of view article, on the Child-Love movement/activism topic.
It repeatedly got gutted [of really, excellent sources, and thorough information] and defaced, by a number of hostile, busy body editors, who refused to let anything but the negative be said about it.
My understanding is, “SqueakBox” was amongst that gaggle of tyrants.
Wikipedia is fine, for mundane topics…but it is complete garbage wherever the issue is socially controversial…You cannot rely on people following proper protocol, and the site owner refuses to stand up and enforce the “neutral point of view” doctrine, which Wikipedia [very falsely] claims to adhere to, when the issue is related to “pedophilia”.
Really pathetic, to say the least…
Oh, and yes…Philip John Eide is just plane sick in the head…
An arrogant punk, with the most cruel, foul and contemptuous outlook I have ever witnessed…He is the living definition, of an ugly person.
He deserves to be locked away.
…It’s no surprise, why he lives his life in hiding.
One can only imagine the kinds of people, who are attracted to that kind of personality…Kind of reminds me of the Charles Manson clan…
Well, actually…”We” don’t have to imagine…we’ve encountered them, first hand…
It’s very sad but true. I am looking forward to tying up all of the loose ends here in Canada. After “We” have secured our victory through the Supreme Court and all illegal amendments that reply upon the AoC to be 16 in Canada are permanently struck from the Criminal Code of Canada, I wonder what Wikipedia will say? I suspect that they will say nothing at all, in fact I bet they’ll completely delete the entire section that talks about Canada just so they can avoid the topic.